Saturday, March 24, 2012

Money: 10 Millenniums In The Making


In the contemporary era, everything revolves around money, a concept proposed since the emergence of the earliest civilization as a general medium of trade. The first thing a man could conjure up in their minds every morning is money, whether it would be farmers in the Philippines or white collar workers in Washington. Money had become the ultimate incentive that had powered our civilization and had shaped the world to its current state. Frankly, money is what we all strive for. It seems that money is not simply an object of value, but an element that had redefined how we live our lives, an agent of globalization and had kindled conflict for the duration of our history yet we know so little about it. People often ask themselves "How do I make money?" but not how money is actually made to the form we see today. With such a question that puzzled our minds, my team and I set out to uncover the story behind currency.

Money At A Glance

The concept of currency began as early as the pre-historic times in the rise of hunter gatherer communities. Goods foraged or hunted is often traded with one another, this is called the barter system. Although barter system seemed to be a rational system for early economies, there are numerous shortcomings of this mean of trade, since there are no explicitly stated benchmark of value  of goods and often these goods could not last over time, the barter system was proven obsolete by the rise of agrarian societies. When the people being adept of domesticating plants and animals, civilizations appeared and the first forms of government came into power, centralized currency was born. Rugged, durable and iconic, aristocrats of the ancient world had placed an official measure of value in their money. Whether it would be cowrie shells in the Pacific or the Denarii of Rome, money became the standard measurement of value and a commodity that could be traded universally. With the advent of metallurgy, precious metals were stamped into coins with a government cipher, making the coin a durable and iconic medium of trade that became dominant in the classical world and is still in use today. Despite all its advantages, the coin is cumbersome and a hassle to make, which these factors inspire the invention of the bank note. Fabricated from fibrous materials, the note is significantly lighter than the coin, yet is flexible in its function for any amount of money could be printed on it. The Tang Dynasty in China had pioneered this concept with the "flying cash", which its name came from how easily it could be blown away due to its lightweight. In Europe, the invention of bank notes became pivotal in our understanding of currency. The bank note started out as a goldsmith's check to redeem one's gold deposited in his vault. These checks are traded liberally and very few returned to the goldsmith for redemption. From then on, bank notes became a legally binding contract, a government's "promise to pay" and hence, a currency's value no longer determined on the materials it is made of, but the government's ability to fullfil this "contract". Currency evolved in parallel to our advancements in technology, which in the informational age, money is now electronic. Electronic payments could be made via credit cards of through carriers like PayPal, so in the near future money may not be a tangible matter anymore.

Tang "Flying Cash" Circa 618-906 CE

The Infographics


In today's world, time is of the essences. The world is revolving at a pace that every move that slows us down will leave us behind in the ever changing world. Therefore, the reception process of information must be accelerated for us to catch up with the rest of the world. Textbooks and essays are obsolete, for such an archaic method of learning will halt our progress in pursuit of information. In the contemporary era, the world and our attention span could only spare us mere minutes to learn. LESS is MORE in the contemporary world and it is how we can compress milleniums worth of information in the smallest parcel possible for our recipient that matters most. But by what means? Enter the infographic.

The infographic is a concentrate of information, squeezed in a short slide that contains a multitude of images and statistics, presented in an artistic way. Our team had decided to create an infographics on our findings in matters concerning the evolution of currency. The infographic we made gave the audiences a concise overview of how money develops through time, with humorous tid-bits of information to spice up a rather dull concept. It offers educational, entertainment and artistic value all in a few megabytes of space. The facts we have displayed on this piece are well researched and condensed into short, easily comprehendible blurbs suitable for audiences of any age. Along with our facts, we have incorporated a few "fun facts" or obscure knowledge about money, which would make our audiences laugh. All facts are accompanied with hand-drawn or photoshopped images meticulously put together by the team, which indeed makes this infographic a work of art that will be appreciated in all occasions. Most importantly, our audiences would be well informed of the history of our money without having to spend hours scanning the archives. In mere minutes, 10 milleniums of evolution in our currency flashed before their eyes, and that is an achievement we take pride of. We have provided the world with yet another medium of education on money like no other, it is a chapter in an economics textbook compiled into a page! As the research division of the team and an economics student, I've spent weeks learning this very topic in class, yet if the instructor had synthesized the facts into a format like our infographics, we would not have to waste that much time. Economists often consider time as an opportunity cost and by learning with our infographic, a chapter of the textbook is covered, that's a bargain!


Behind the Scenes


An infographic may look simple in content, but do not let the looks fool you, it is an arduous task, especially with a team to manage and a deadline to meet. The team consists of three people, including me. Leadership in these circumstances is the key to success, and it is I that took the initiative to lead. My management strategie utilizes the division of labor to its authentic form, which is literally dividing my group into three divisions according to the teammate's atributes: the research, technology and art division. The role of each division is clearly stated and in addition of being a researcher, I oversee the whole operation. To increase the efficiency of our work, I have set secondary due dates for components made by the teammates such as images and the template to ensure a smooth operation. The procedure of making this infographics are as follows:

1) Find all the information necessary.

2) Draw a brief plan on paper, then distribute it among the crew

3) The art division drew the picture in accordance to the facts

4) The tech division will build a template of the infographic on a software and photoshop images sent by the members of the group.

5) Facts and images are assembled on the template by the tech-division and finalize the project by adding some finishing touches.


A draft of the infographic. Note the ridiculous use of color!

With exceptional discipline my group mates have submitted their work on time and the project was completed just in time. Our art division's talent had exceeded our expectation, with the use of the "Bamboo" apparatus to draw images into the computer, we have produced authentic pieces of art that matched well with the tech division's photoshopped images. The template is made using a simple, yet innovative software called Pages on the Mac OS. Pages is a word processing program with similar attributes to Microsoft Word, but is more interactive (human friendly) and is capable of producing high end document formats and objects. This is why our tech-division had selected Pages because its simply one of the best means to make a professional looking template without any hassle. We are indeed a technology oriented team which adopted various forms of technology to make this project a success, including Google Docs and Skype as a medium to distribute information or relaying commands.
An example if image drawn using the Bamboo.

Nothing is perfect and there are instances of problems in the operation. One of the most critical issues our group must contend with is the differences in the crew's working hour and absences. In our working stages, I have been absent due to a field trip I must attend, causing the work to lag behind and there are no to inspect the group's work. This delay in progress caused us to have to rush through the project, compromising its quality. Another impediment to our progress is technology, like a double edged blade, technology could both help and hurt us at the same time. In  a timed, high stress situations, the tech-division puzzled over the methods of creating the template and formatting it, thus this process of trial and error significantly slowed us down. Nevertheless, as an IT virtuoso, the tech-division had came up with an ingenius solution, the Pages.

An image before photoshopping, used in the infographics. Note how editing images adds originality in the project.

Making this infographics is more than a mere assignment to us, but a lesson for every one in the team. It is a challenge that have pushed us over the edge of conventional methods of learning, instead of absorbing knowledge, we share it. That is indeed a difficulty we must overcome and when we do, our horizon is broadened. We learn to integrate technology, knowledge and art in harmony to each other and create a product that will be valued. This is progress.






Monday, March 19, 2012

The Paradox of The Thai Gun Control Policy

Crime has been an ordeal that all civilization must contend with, from the dawn of mankind to the contemporary era. Misconducts from petty thefts to rape and homicides have been more than a nuisance to the society, but a threat to its very foundation. With the rise of modern technology, crimes are committed liberally with ease while advancements in law enforcement lags behind, overshadowed by the ever increasing crime rates. So far, no nation had rid itself of the pestilence of crime, even Thailand, which is coined as the ‘land of smiles’, could not escape from such a harsh reality. The question is: how can law abiding citizens in Thailand eke out their living with murderers lurking around the corner and insurgents detonating bombs in the heart of Bangkok where the police force are obsolete and outnumbered by the perpetrators? With such facts explicitly stated, the burden of defense does not lie within the authorities of the government but the civilians themselves, but without the right tool, civilians are at the mercy of the miscreant’s arms. That tool is the firearm. Firearms, with centuries worth of innovation stacked behind them, are the most reliable means of defense because of their range and stopping power. However, unlike civilized western nations, they are out of reach from the Thai civilians due to the government’s draconian gun-control acts, thus leaving the people vulnerable. Paradoxically, the Thai law made it difficult for civilians to own firearms and impossible to carry them. According to the Thai law, civilians can only own small caliber firearms or smooth bored shotguns and had to fill heap loads of paperwork in order to be able to purchase them. Gun importation will travel through miles of red tape and taxed mercilessly, thus bringing the price of guns to three times its original price. To make matters worse, carrying a loaded firearm outside of the shooting range is considered felony. Therefore, it is time for the people to muster what is left of their dignity, arm themselves and repeal these unjust laws!

Law enforcement agencies are those people relied on for civil defense, however, the Thai Police perverted this concept from defending the people to oppressing them. Paid with a salary comparable to janitors, the police force could barely feed themselves, therefore, they have to abandon their proud mission to defend the thin line of morality in the society, to reaping money from people via bribes and fraudulent tickets issued at street blockades. Behind the bulwarks of political influence, the police, from privates to prosecutors, they were all fattened with bribes. Despite the corruption, lawmen in the field will have to pay for their sidearms in instalments and struggled to keep their guns loaded with live rounds due to their lack of connections. With the underarmed police busy manning their road blocks or lobbying high profile politicians, the civilians are left to contend with hordes of criminals.

Such a scenario is present in the contemporary Thai society and with the crime rates increasing exponentially, taking rape for instance, its statistics have doubled in the past decades with the number of arrests of only 36%, it is safe to say that the law enforcement could not defend the people. Worse, 90% of all firearms used to commit crimes were illegal, unlicensed guns. It is paradoxical how the Thai gun control laws kept the convicts armed and keeps good Samaritans from owning them. The reality is when a “bad guy” wants a gun, he gets them simply via the black market for he had no fear for the law, yet leaving the law abiding citizens helpless. This perverse rationale of the gun control act made the “bad guys” own more guns and “good guys”, with respect to the law unarmed. Arms, when handed to criminals, became their advantage to exploit those without it and it seemed that this perverted rationale of the law had not occur to our feeble government. Arms are simply inanimate set of parts built to shoot rounds, similar to cars which are also a compilation of parts used for transportation, they do not have a mind of their own, as Neil Postman stated in the fifth essential idea of technological change that technology is as moral as the ones using them. If so, why should gun control restrict the ownership of firearms to those morally and sane enough to handle them?

Four hundred years ago, John Locke, a British philosopher, stated that a man shall have 3 rights he is born with: the right to life, liberty and property. The most important one, as he states, is the right to life. This philosophy was carried throughout world, which it was tweaked and refined by Thomas Jefferson and became the foundation of American constitution. Soon, these rights became the icon of the modern democracy, signifying the concept of human dignity and life. No one possess the right to take a man’s life away, but for an incentive, they will. This led to the creation of America’s 2nd Amendment: the right to bear arms. If you value the rights to your life, liberty and property (and to a certain extent, virginity), you must fight for it, fight for the right to bear arms!




EU's Breaking Point: The Winning Essay


By: Pichanon Nantavaropas (Nud)

It is apparent to all that Europe is in an economical crisis. With Greece spending in deficit for years, nothing could be more obvious. After Greece declared its bankruptcy, Portugal, Spain and Ireland followed suit. Later, Italy soon joined them as one of the largest European Union nation who finally submits to its debts. Bail out packages had been distributed, but the situation continues to regress. The magnitude of this crisis is so great that many Europeans proposed the dissolution of the European Union to save their nations from the wrath of their neighbor’s debts. The effects of this crisis are felt globally. Banks in the Far East are beginning to back their assets with insurances and stock prices are dropping. The question is: where did this all begin? One could simply trace the origins of this crisis to three rudimentary elements consisting of the disproportion of spending to income, external economical turmoil and the government’s inability to manage their spending.

Why does Europe owe the world so much?
To begin with, one must investigate the most basic principal of an economy: household spending.  As an Old World region, Europe is the cradle of human development and culture. Deceived by the façade of their former glory and wealth, Europeans continues to indulge various articles of luxury while their productivity decreases. The bottom line: the people are spending more that they can’t afford to.
With the influx of competent Asian competition, the European’s productivity prowess is challenged. Once deemed inferior to the Old World craftsmanship, Asian products soon became a threat to the classic European way of life. Japanese and Korean electrical appliances and automobiles proved to be equal, if not better than its Old World counterpart at a fraction of the cost. Asian goods soon replaced the European’s in the world market.  This brought the decline of European industries, especially in the field of electrical appliances, which they once reigned supreme.
Currently, the only profitable trade that still lingers in Europe is tourism, which does not involve any material productivity. For instance, tourism accounts for 15% of Greece’s GDP. The result is decreased revenue for both the European firm and its employees. In addition, typical Europeans often work for only six hours in average and overtime is unlikely. Unemployment rates are also raising rapidly, the reason in which 23% of Spain’s workforce are out of jobs presently. Labor productivity in Europe is constantly decreasing from 0.9% of the GDP to 0.3% by the end of 2011 and if forecasted to go below 0 in the next quarter.
The decreased income, coupled with irrationally high spending is definitely the catalyst of such an economical crisis. To prolong their way of life, the people resorted to loans, putting theirs assets and their future on the line.  In Greece, an average individual would owe about 31,000 Euros in debt and with a total of approximately 340 billion Euros nationwide. (5) These statistics are indeed staggering, and this is an example of how what a nation would become if they are using the money they would receive in the future to satisfy their desires of the present. This concept clearly does not sound, but ironically, it worked for a couple of years until Greece became bankrupt, coupled with the worldwide recession. (7)

Europe continues to deceive the world that they are wealthy nations and is backed by the people’s consumption habits. As home to ultra luxurious products such as the Ferrari supercar to Louis Vuitton handbags, it is plausible to some that Europe is still ‘rich’ while the truth is the opposite. This is the reason why the Europeans got away with such conduct for far too long.
It is an inevitable fact that the root of EU’s debt crisis began with household and individual debt, which quickly escalated to a national level. This is proved by the EU’s low inflation rate, which hovers around 2% according to the Consumer Price Index and dropping at a record breaking -0.70% in July 2009. It is expected to be around 1.7% in 2012. This evidence indicates a sign of recession in Europe. A recession is an event where the people do not have enough money to spend, thus causing the economy to decline. With the towering debt, European households must act fast before they are consumed by their deficit spending.



 America: The Catalyst to the EU Crisis?            
The European economy is definitely on their way to the bottom, but what makes the process more severe is the effects of external economical crisis, specifically, the downturn of the US economy.
The US economical crises began in 2008 with the rising cost of real estates, and with the people were willing to buy it. The brief economical boom gave the prospectors leverage in the demand for real estate as people became wealthier. This led individuals to purchase property in installment preceded by the down payment and then sold for to those who would pay them large sums of money that satisfies both the original price of the estate and costs of their installment plans. Individuals rushed to purchase multiple properties by loaning banks, paying only the down payment, and waiting for a buyer. This process is called speculation where the prospectors were expected to gain money from their retail of their mortgages to cover the other property’s installments. In that process, the dealer could reap a fair amount of profit in the process while they do not need to make large investments.  (4)
With the rising prospects of dealing real estates, individuals soon were mortgaging more homes than they could afford to do so. The purchase of real estate caused their prices to increase beyond its true value. With the hyperbolic inflation of home prices, people soon realize that they simply cannot afford them. Then the sale of property dropped and individual dealers, without customers to help pay the installment of their property, were in debt to banks. This stirred up the bubbles in the economy. As a result, banks are holding heap loads of unpaid mortgages.
Desperate to regain their investments, banks grouped their mortgages into funds and sold bonds to these properties with promising benefits. This is called the “Subprime”. It became a hit in the mortgage bond market until again, the people realized that the values of the real estates and their bonds were dropping as a result of the recession caused by speculation. The bond owners lost their faith in their real estate bonds and reclaimed their investments all at once. The bubble bursts when the market was saturated with subprime real estate bonds and the dealer’s mortgages are due.
Banks were now bankrupt and are at the mercy of government bailouts. The “Subprime” crisis had claimed the business of the world’s largest financial institution, the Lehman Brothers. When the loans are claimed, the once prosperous dealers were stripped of their properties and the nation is once again in the greatest depression since the Wall Street Crash in 1929. Banks are holding mortgages that won’t sell and individual prospectors were bankrupt. (3)

This event is an American variant of the Tom Yum Goong crisis of Thailand in 1997 where the concept similar to “Subprime” was introduced with similar effects.  Banks, after confiscating a considerable amount of money and is now in charge of the mortgages, decided to allow foreigners to invest on these debt and mortgages. This jeopardizes not only the Thai economy but also the whole region of South East Asia who invested in Thailand’s property market. The situation was lifted when the US came in with a bailout package and a plan to subsidize the bank’s debt. It took at least a decade for Thailand to recover, and traces of this crisis are left in a multitude of abandoned property in Bangkok.
Fast-forward to the present, Paul Krugman, an economics Nobel Prize Laureate, stated that China is in a similar scenario with “Real estate investment has roughly doubled as a share of G.D.P. since 2000, accounting directly for more than half of the overall rise in investment.” Which, as stated before, the rise of real estate investment could only mean a start of a depression “…and a world economy already suffering from the mess in Europe really, really doesn’t need a new epicenter of crisis.” Krugman, Will China Break?, The New York Times. (1)
Today, the US is still recovering from the “Subprime” crisis and matters are about to get worse. The Americans are spending beyond their income. With the economy in rough shape and is yet to recover from a recent depression, the nation cannot afford to spend. Similar to the Europeans mentioned, household spending became a problem that yields dire consequences, not only to the nation, but also throughout the world.
The US is the one of the world’s largest markets and with its citizen in debt, the trading will cease, thus forcing the Obama administration to allow additional debt to be made to the GDP. This not only increases America’s deficit spending but also forced the treasury to print out more money resulting in the decrease in the value of the dollar. With the decrease of the dollar and the credit rating, the US dollar is worth less and the investors suffer.
This shook the world economy, affecting all nations with trade affiliations to the US, including the EU. With people with barely any money to spend and investors bugging out, the EU too languished for their top consumer is going under.
The aftermath of the US subprime can be seen in EU’s dropping GDP. Starting from the US top supplier of automobiles, Germany had seen a GDP decrease of 3.1% and its growth rate is now at 0. GDP’s of other EU nations such as Ireland (-2.4), Greece (-4.1), Portugal (-3.9), and Italy (-1.8) had seen their GDP drop below 0 by 2012.  By the end of 2011, the EU had seen a 5.8% shrink in export with respect to its GDP. The effects low labor productivity coupled with the troubling trade partners are taking its toll on the Europeans as the average unemployment rate rose to 10%. This not only suggests the effects of the declining foreign markets like the US, but also the end of the European superiority in economics.
           
The Sovereign Debt Crisis
The term “Sovereign Debt Crisis” often came to mind when mentioning the current European economical downfall. Sovereign debts are debts that a government issued as bonds or other forms to be invested by foreign nations. These are the debt that is currently constraining the progress of Europe. To satisfy the government’s lavish spending and political marketing ploys, the nation had to loan from the others.  

It began as early as 2004 when Greece went over its budget in hosting the Athens Summer Olympic Games. As the revenue of the EU is decreasing, government spending reflected the opposite. In nations such as Greece where there are no real sector productivity, the government retains its high payroll for its officers and civilian social services. Tax evasions are common and that reduces the government’s revenue even further, especially in Greece. (5)
International loans are issued liberally these days and even the US had bonds held by emerging nations like China. In many cases, for a nation to retain its credit rating, it has to pay off its debt. Failure to do so will turn the nation into a state what is called a default, and of course, being degraded in credit.
Default is the state that occurs when a debtor breaks the promises of a loan by either failing to pay in time, or not being able to repay the loan at all. When a country is in a default, it is a no man’s land for private sector investors; therefore, they are at the mercy of bailouts. Greece is currently in a default and they have 340 billion Euros that is due. This represents the government’s failure to manage national debts, forcing them to succumb to the conditions of the bailout. Typical conditions of a bailout would include the introduction of austerity policies in the government, which is essentially, determines the spending cuts and tax raise.



George Papandreou, the Greece prime minister, is forced to resign as a result of the previous government’s heap of debts. It is a shocking fact that Papandreou ‘discovered’ the debt according BBC; one could speculate that this process had been going on for a while. Similar to household debt issues, the government had spending that is way over their annual revenue, which could result in a sovereign debt crisis.
By having debt in the government, the nation suffers. For instance, the credit rating of the nation decreases, causing existing investors to withdraw their investments and preventing investors in the future to invest in the country. This greatly decreases the nation’s revenue and shatters its reputation. Greece fits this bill as all major credit raters rated Greece to the lowest possible level, beyond its previous BBB-.
In a Sovereign Debt crisis, not only the debtor suffered but also banks and investors, whose loans are not paid. Greece had issue bonds that were bought by various nations in the EU and throughout the world. It is apparent that France suffered most for they have invested in over 56.7% of Greece’s debt followed by Germany who had 33.9%.  It is an inevitable fact that sovereign debt in Europe is an imminent cause of the current economical turmoil, and this should serve as a warning for governments to not spend beyond their potential or face consequences similar to the modern day Greece.

             
Europe’s “New Deal”

It occurs to many that this is a grave moment for the EU and the threat of dissolution is looming. Yet for every problem there will be a solution, and that includes those of the EU. The first solution that came to mind is austerity, the most common method to tackle a debt crisis where slashing spending and raising tax is of the essences. Austerity policies are taking place in Greece, Spain, Portugal and other failing nations of the EU.
The concept of austerity, is however, proved to be unpopular amongst the people, resulting in pickets and protests against the government. This is especially apparent in Greece and riots broke out nation wide against the austerity policies. It is not difficult to fathom the causation of such phenomena. Firstly, a considerable amount of civilians are employed in Europe’s public sector, in nations such as Greece, the public sector accounts to 40% of the national GDP, which federal spending cuts would only mean a curtailed salary for the government employees. Secondly, the tax rate in the EU is already high, if not the highest, with tax contributing at the staggering rate of 39.2% of GDP in Greece. No doubt the people display such discontent. (8)
Experts too were not satisfied with the EU’s rash solution; one of them is Krugman.  He stated, “By demanding ever harsher austerity have played a major role in making the situation worse.” This is because “…the combination of austerity-for-all and a central bank morbidly obsessed with inflation makes it essentially impossible for indebted countries to escape from their debt trap and is, therefore, a recipe for widespread debt defaults, bank runs and general financial collapse.” Krugman, Killing the Euro, The New York Times. Krugman’s claim was confirmed by 17th -23rd September 2011 edition of The Economist’s cover article: How to Save the Euro, which stated that “… [EU] needs to shift the euro zone’s macroeconomic policy from budget-cutting towards an agenda for growth.” in one of the four things the EU had to do to save the Euro How to Save the Euro, The Economist. (9)The European authority, however, denies these claims as the European Central Bank (ECB), Jean-Claude Trichet replied, “The idea that austerity measures could trigger stagnation is incorrect.”. Surely, the EU’s petty pretenses won’t do in a time of crisis like these but immediate action in a massive scale would. (2)
By only cutting spending, the EU would ironically slow down their own economy, without spending, matters could only worsen as spending is a vital element in keeping a market up and running. Yet, the expenditures should be maintained at a realistic level. The EU should be focusing on increasing productivity, rather that slicing budgets because to create a self-sustainable economy, for a nation must revitalize its industries rather than relying on foreign aid. Starting with Greece, the government should create productive, real sector industries that actually turn out goods that can be exported (that is after the debts are dealt with, of course) and soon Europe would be on the road to its recovery.  (6)
The Bottom Line
           
            In conclusive, it is clear that the major causes of the current EU crisis would be the disproportional ratios in consumption to productivity, economical downturns in the USA and the failure of governments in managing spending. As stated numerous times in this article, spending is the element that often spells an economy’s boom or bust. In an economy, spending both fuels and lubricates the engines of a market. The problem today is how to keep it balanced. Too much expenditure would lead to the EU’s current situation and too little would keep an economy in an eternal regression. Indeed, the European aristocrats cannot seem to find a midway between the two where spending comes in harmony with revenue. Once the center of human advancement in technology, philosophy and economics, Europe is soon to become the world’s largest debtors and the worse is yet to come.           
           

Bibliography

1) Krugman, Paul. "Will China Break?." New York Times. 18 Dec 2011: 1. Web. 8 Jan. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/19/opinion/krugman-will-china-break.html>.
2) Krugman, Paul. "Killing the Euro." New York Times. 1 Dec 2011: 1. Web. 8 Jan. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/02/opinion/krugman-killing-the-euro.html>.
3) "The Downturn in Facts and Figures." BBC News. 21 Nov 2007: 1. Web. 8 Jan. 2012. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7073131.stm
4) Moseley, Fred. "The US Economics: Causes and Solutions." International Socialist Review. (2009): 1. Web. 8 Jan. 2012. <http://www.isreview.org/issues/64/feat-
5) "Q&A: Greek Debt Crisis." BBC News. 10 Nov 2011: 1. Web. 8 Jan. 2012. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13798000>.
6) Inman, Phillip. "Eurozone strains increase with grim new economic data." Guardian. 6 Jan 2012: 1. Web. 8 Jan. 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jan/06/eurozone-grim-economic-data>.
7) . "Euro Area Debt to GDP." Trading Economics. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Jan 2012. <http://www.tradingeconomics.com/euro-area/government-debt-to-gdp>.
8) . "Greece." CIA World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency, n.d. Web. 8 Jan 2012. <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gr.html>.
9) "How to save the Euro." Economist. 17 Sep 2011: 9. Print.